I hate the words ‘method’ and ‘technique’ -- as well as the 'how' word -- I really do. My use of the word 'how' in the title to this post, clearly implying the supposed need for a method or technique in order to achieve the sought-after end, is intentionally provocative ... not to mention mischievous. Read on.
Some of you will have heard the Zen story that goes like this. A disciple says to the master, ‘I have been four months with you, and you have still given me no method or technique.’ The master says, ‘A method? What on earth would you want a method for?’ The disciple says, ‘To attain inner freedom.’ The master roars with laughter, and then says, ‘You need great skill indeed to set yourself free by means of the trap called a method.’
Some of you will have heard the Zen story that goes like this. A disciple says to the master, ‘I have been four months with you, and you have still given me no method or technique.’ The master says, ‘A method? What on earth would you want a method for?’ The disciple says, ‘To attain inner freedom.’ The master roars with laughter, and then says, ‘You need great skill indeed to set yourself free by means of the trap called a method.’
Unless we empty ourselves of methods and techniques -- all of
which are forms of conditioning -- we will never come to know truth. But how
does one let go of conditioning, you may ask? Never ask how,
because you are then asking for a method, a technique, and all such methods and
techniques are nothing but, yes, conditioning. However, it’s even worse than
that, as J. Krishnamurti [pictured right] has pointed out:
I think it is very important to understand that any effort made to free oneself from one's conditioning is another form of conditioning. If I try to free myself from Hinduism, or any other ism, I am making that effort in order to achieve what I consider to be a more desirable state; therefore, the motive to change conditions the change. So I must realize my own conditioning and do absolutely nothing. This is very difficult. But I must know for myself that my mind is small, petty, confused, conditioned, and see that any effort to change it is still within the field of that confusion; therefore, any such effort only breeds further confusion.
It’s
the old, old story, namely, no effort of the self can remove the self. Don’t
try to remove the self. It can’t be done. Indeed, don’t try at all,
but rather look, observe … and let. Once you see the folly and
illusion of all self-effort, and the futile attempt by one self to remove
another self from one’s life (which is the basis of so-called willpower), you
will come to know the truth as one. It’s as simple as that. Simple, but not
easy. The good news is that the mind can free itself.
Here
is a powerful phrase – powerful if you understand its truth -- ‘self is
illusion’. The worst delusion of all is the belief in the existence of some
supposedly permanent and substantial ‘self’ at the centre of our conscious---or
even unconscious---awareness. The
‘self’ does not exist, at least it does not exist in
the sense of possessing a separate, independent, unchangeable, material
existence of its own. In words attributed to the Buddha, whether 'past, future, or present; internal or external, manifest or subtle ... as it actually is ... "This is not mine. This is not my self. This is not what I am"' (Majjhima Nikaya I, 130).
Ever
since we were born we have been accumulating hundreds of ideas, concepts and
notions -- not to mention beliefs – about who we are. Most of these ideas,
concepts and notions are false. There are, in our mind, layer upon layer of mental
and emotional adhesions and accretions. Many of these have come from our
parents, our schooling, and religious conditioning. Others have been
self-built, as a reaction to life experience. Over time, beginning
from the very moment of our birth, sensory perceptions -- especially what we
see [including read] and hear -- harden into memories and other thought-forms formed
out of aggregates of thought and feeling. In time, the illusion of a separate self
emerges. However, the truth is that our mental continuity and sense of identity and existence are simply the result of habit, memory and conditioning.
Hundreds and thousands of separate, ever-changing and
ever-so-transient mental occurrences harden into a fairly persistent mental
construct of sorts which is no more than a confluence of impermanent components
(‘I-moments’ or ‘selves’) cleverly synthesized by the mind in a way
which appears to give them a singularity and a separate and independent existence and life of their own. The result is a 'self' -- actually losts and lots of selves. At any one point in time, we mistakenly believe any one or more of these false selves to be the real person that each one of us is.
Know this. The real person that we are is something other than those selves. You are a person -- a mind-body complex in
respect of which both physical characteristics and states of consciousness can
be ascribed. Yes, you are much, much more than those hundreds of little, false
selves---all those waxing and waning ‘I’s’ and ‘me’s’---with which you tend to
identify, in the mistaken belief that they constitute the ‘real me,’ that is,
the person that you are. Only the latter is ontologically real. Personal freedom and real
personal transformation come when we get
real, that is, when we start to think, act and live from our personhood as a person among persons. We need to
get our mind off our ‘selves’ and rise above them if we are to get real. And
remember this---there is no human problem that is not common to other persons
among persons.
Self-discovery
and self-knowledge -- not to mention real self-transformation -- begin with the
shattering of illusion. Ignorance or non-discrimination -- avidyā in Sanskrit -- is identifying
yourself with any one or more of those false selves to which I have referred
above. The real ‘I’ is the person that you are. So, the very next time you find
yourself – that is, the person that you are – saying something like ‘I am angry’,
‘I am frightened’ or ‘I like [this or that]’, please understand that the person
that you are is identifying with one or other of those many false selves to the
extent that the false self takes over.
There is, in Hindu philosophy and
spirituality, a small book of great wisdom titled Atmabodha (‘Self-Knowledge’), which is attributed to Sankarachara [pictured right] although he was probably not its author. It doesn’t matter for present purposes
who was the author; it’s what is contained in the book that is important. The
author gives a couple of very simple but useful illustrations:
The reflection of
moon in water that is not still gives an impression that the moon is moving
because of ignorance.
… … … …
An ignorant person
thinks that the moon is moving whereas it is the clouds that are really moving.
Ignorance (avidyā) arises from a lack of discrimination, that is, from not
seeing things as they really are.
There is no ‘method’ or ‘technique’
for seeing things as they really are. In order to see things as they really are
all you need to do is remove the obstacles to seeing things as they really are.
The biggest obstacle is the illusion of self.
Seeing things as they really are. That is what the word vipassanā ('insight meditation' or mindfulness) means. The word is composed of two parts – vi, meaning ‘in various ways’, and passanā, meaning seeing. So, vipassanā means ‘seeing in various ways’ as well as seeing things as they
really are.
The good
news is that the mind can free itself from all of its conditioning. But for
that to occur there needs to be a choiceless awareness of the presence of
conditioning---that is, no condemnation, no judgment, no analysis, no
interpretation, no evaluation, just a ‘total perception’ of life as it unfolds
from one moment to the next. That’s where mindfulness comes in, for that is
what mindfulness is. It’s all about developing and using what I've referred to
elsewhere as a mindful mind of no-mind---that is, an empty mind, a mind that is
always open to truth as it unfolds unceasingly, a mind characterised by
openness and passive alertness.
Truth
--- that is, life, also known as reality -- is never static. It is dynamic.
Conditioning, including all belief-systems, is otherwise. A conditioned
mind is a closed, conflicted, and divided mind.
Am I
suggesting that you make it your New Year’s resolution to start seeing things
as they really are? No, I am not. There is no need to ‘resolve’ anything. The
very act of making a resolution implies a lack of power to do the thing in the
absence of the resolution. Resolutions are nothing other than the imposition of
one’s will over one’s thoughts and actions. In order to see things as they
really are you simply … look … and observe … perceive … without condemnation, judgment,
analysis, interpretation and evaluation.
Go to it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.